McKeown Medical
167 Bath Street, Glasgow, G2 4SQ
Date posted — 21.10.24
There are a few topics in aesthetic medicine that are more controversial than tear trough filler. You will hear a wide variety of opinions on the internet, from some people hailing the tear trough filler as the holy grail of under-eye rejuvenation all the way through to people telling you that the whole concept is the spawn of satan and you should never even think about having it done.
I’m going to explain to you what the tear trough is when filler in this area is helpful, when you should avoid it, and what other procedures may be more appropriate depending on your circumstances.
The tear trough is the hollow groove that runs at the junction between the lower eyelid and cheek, right at the corner of your eye near your nose. It gets its name from the fact tears can collect in this groove (or trough) when we cry. Everyone has one naturally, and it tends to get deeper as we lose volume under the eye as part of the ageing process. As the tear trough gets deeper, it creates a shadow, which makes the under-eye area look darker and more tired.
Since the tear trough tends to get deeper with age, creating more shadowing and darkness under the eye, it is an area that people often want to improve aesthetically as they age. Correcting the tear trough with some filler injections usually results in a nice improvement in the appearance of the under-eye area. However, ageing of the lower eyelid is not just down to the deepening of the tear trough on its own – this is where things get a little more complicated, and it is one of the main reasons for the controversy around tear trough fillers.
Ageing of the lower eyelid usually involves a combination of multiple processes. Most people have some volume loss caused by reabsorption of the bone below the eye (yes, the bones of our face are being reabsorbed and literally disintegrating as we age!).
There can also be herniation of fat below the eye, resulting in prominent bulges of fat under the eye – and this is one of the first sources of mistakes that people make with tear trough filler. If the fat protrusion is minor, then you can use some filler to camouflage it. However, if there is more moderate or severe fat protrusion and you try to camouflage it all, then you will simply make the eyelid look smooth but puffy – which is not a good outcome. In these circumstances, you probably need a lower eyelid blepharoplasty to remove the herniated fat.
The other change below the eyelid is to the surface of the skin – which can develop fine lines, wrinkles, crepey texture, or pigmentation changes. Again, some fine lines may get a little better by adding filler to the tear trough, but if you have a lot of fine lines, then you likely need a different type of treatment – either laser resurfacing or possible eyelid surgery, to treat this.
The number one mistake people make with under-eye filler is trying to use it as a ‘cure-all’ for every other eyelid problem rather than sticking to its main purpose – which is the hollow junction between the eyelid and the cheek.
When it comes to under-eye rejuvenation, hyaluronic acid fillers are the most commonly used – although some doctors use your own fat (harvested from elsewhere on the body). I personally use hyaluronic acid, and I will explain why. Proponents of fat will tell you that it’s more natural because it’s your own tissue, which is true. However, fat can go lumpy, and if that happens to you, then it can be almost impossible to correct. If you gain weight in the future, then fat will also grow, and what was initially a good result can end up becoming too much.
Proponents of fat will tell you that hyaluronic acid fillers are a bad idea under the eye because hyaluronic acid retains water and can make you puffy. This is partially true, in that hyaluronic acid does retain water and can make you puffy – which is why choosing the right product and injecting the correct amount in the correct place is critical to achieving a good result.
I personally chose to use Juvederm Volbella for most of my tear trough filler treatments because it has a relatively low concentration of hyaluronic acid at 15mg/ml. My personal observation is that the lower the concentration of hyaluronic acid in the gel, the less water retention you get and the fewer problems you see with puffiness following treatment. Again, as well as injecting the correct product – you also need to be conservative with the volume injected, and you need to be careful not to try and push it too far in an effort to correct other eyelid issues that would be better treated with other modalities like laser or surgery.
The tear trough filler procedure begins with a detailed consultation and examination. During the consultation, we want to find out about your medical history, any medications you take, and any allergies you may have, and we want to know about what cosmetic treatments you’ve had in the past – especially around the eye area. This is especially important for tear trough filler consults.
I normally do tear trough fillers using a blunt-tipped cannula. This usually means just one sharp needle stick to create an entry point, following which you normally just feel a little movement sensation under the skin – but not pain.
Afterwards, there will be some redness and swelling from the injection. You can normally see an instant improvement, although it typically improves over the first couple of weeks as the filler settles in and retains a little water, which smooths things over a bit more (we always try to slightly undercorrect because we know there is going to be a little water retention, even with a good product).
Choosing a qualified and experienced injector is paramount to achieving the best results and minimising potential risks with any cosmetic procedure, but this is especially true when treating the tear trough. Having the judgement of how much to inject and where is critical to achieving a good outcome. The reason you see so many mixed reviews of tear trough filler is that it is the most technically challenging procedure to perform, and poor planning and technique are usually responsible for bad outcomes.
Like any medical procedure, tear trough fillers come with potential risks and side effects. The biggest issue following treatment is a poor cosmetic outcome. This is often caused by either injecting the wrong type of filler, which retains a lot of extra water, or injecting too much gel – either from poor judgement or a misguided effort to correct other eyelid issues is usually responsible for poor cosmetic outcomes. A careful, judicious approach from an experienced doctor should avoid this.
The duration of all hyaluronic acid fillers is almost always longer than you expect. The fillers, depending on the product, are licensed to last up to two years – although there is plenty of evidence to show that they can hang around much longer than this. This is especially so in the tear trough. I once had a patient with swollen tear troughs who insisted the swelling couldn’t be due to filler injections because it had been ten years since she had filler. And guess what? I injected some hyaluronidase, and the swelling went away. TEN years later. It doesn’t always last that long, but it’s important to consider this when you are thinking about repeating the treatment.
One of the biggest mistakes that people make with tear troughs is repeating the filler treatment too frequently. If you think you are ready for another tear trough filler it’s important to go through a full assessment again – is it really recurrent tear trough hollowing that’s the problem, or is it another age-related change that would be best treated with another type of treatment? Just because a tear trough filler worked well for you in the past doesn’t mean that it will always be the right solution for you. This is where a good relationship with an experienced doctor is critical to ensure the best results.
The cost of tear trough fillers can vary widely, depending on factors such as the type of filler used and the expertise of the doctor. It’s important to remember that while cost is a consideration, the skill and experience of the doctor should be paramount, and it’s worth saving a little longer or travelling a little further to get the best treatment.
Tear trough fillers are a great way to rejuvenate the under-eye area – provided you get the right advice and technical treatment delivery by an experienced doctor. It’s not a cure for all under-eye problems – but a nuanced approach to a particular set of circumstances.
Here is one of our patients before and two weeks after tear trough filler.
1 / 3
2 / 3
3 / 3
HA Fillers are making a comeback! Here are my thoughts on the how and why 👀
How long does a facelift last? One of the most common questions we hear, but it doesn’t have a straightforward answer. Here is our facelift expert @bramhallplasticsurgery talking about some of the nuance.
I’ve been getting lots of questions about what I’ve been up to with my own skin recently. So here you are… the full uncensored version 👀
Introducing Julaine - a new biostimulator I am very excited about!
To explain the background, we need to start with Sculptra - which is having a bit of a moment again on socials. Sculptra is made of PLLA which stimulates your own body to create more collagen, which sounds instantly appealing especially for patients who want to avoid HA fillers.
The problem is that 1 in 5 people who have Sculptra develop nodules which is why - despite the beautiful results we often see from it - I have never used it in my practice (at least not in the face). The trade off in terms of the risk of nodules is just too high for me to feel comfortable with.
We now have a new version, called Julaine, made from a Swedish company called Nordberg. The scientists at Nordberg have refined the manufacturing process to make the PLLA particles smaller and smoother and in doing so have eliminated the problems associated with Sculptra.
I have only just recently started working with Julaine (it’s been around for a couple of years now, but I never like to be the first to use it - I always want to make sure the real world data matches up to what the pharma companies tell us). The treatment is delivered over three sessions, one month apart, with gradual tissue regeneration and volumising occurring slowly over time.
The course of 3 sessions costs £3000 and results typically last up to 2 years. It’s a great addition for other regenerative treatments like Sofwave skin tightening. It’s also great for patients who’ve had HA fillers and feel like they need something else, but aren’t quite ready for more HA yet.
What do you think?
One of Dr Kavita’s breast reduction patients sent this gorgeous bouquet of flowers after her follow up - simply because she felt so grateful for her result and the care our team provided.
Moments like this remind us why we do what we do and why ‘how’ we do it is so important. Surgery has traditionally been a very male-dominated world, but Kavita brings something different - exceptional technical skill combined with empathy, warmth and a genuine understanding of women’s bodies and aesthetics.
There can be a lot of pressure on women in surgery to abandon their femininity to fit in. Kavita hasn’t done that. She’s succeeded by being completely herself.
And that’s exactly why our patients love her (and why we do too).
We’re very proud to have her as part of the McKeown Medical team.
This patient came to the clinic thinking she needed a facelift to get what she wanted. We do facelifts - lots of them. But for this patient, her biggest issue wasn’t loose skin.
It was skin quality, which is something we see a lot of, so we suggested she fix that first. This is the result. Fully ablative resurfacing isn’t easy, but for the right patient, it can be life-changing.
The patient is delighted with her results. What do you think?
Another gorgeous result for another gorgeous patient by the very talented @bramhallplasticsurgery.
This patient is 2 months post-op and loving life with her new eyelids. As well as looking better, she can see better because the weight of the excess skin has been removed. The patient is delighted.
What do you think?
Last week marked a huge milestone for us at McKeown Medical.
Our first full lists of major surgical procedures - something we’ve been carefully building towards for several years - and I couldn’t be prouder of this team.
Led by Dr Kavita, we treated patients for breast augmentation (using both implants and fat transfer), breast reduction, uplift surgery and intimate female procedures, with every case approached thoughtfully, calmly and with meticulous care.
What meant the most to me wasn’t just the surgery itself - it was the experience our patients had.
Thanks to Dr Rob and his modern anaesthetic techniques, patients were comfortable, clear-headed and walking around within an hour of surgery - no nausea, no vomiting, just smooth recoveries.
Our wonderful nursing team cared for everyone before and after, and Lorraine kept the entire day running like clockwork behind the scenes.
Moments like this remind me why we’ve taken our time to grow these services properly. We could have rushed this process, but we’ve taken our time to get it right. I never wanted to simply add surgery to the clinic - I wanted to rethink how patients experience the surgical process.
We’re only just getting started, and I’m incredibly excited about what this means for the patients across Scotland and beyond who choose to trust us with their care.
As all of our patients know, the neck is the one part of the anatomy we always struggle to treat without surgery.
This patient underwent CoolSculpting to reduce some of the excess fatty tissue under her chin, followed by @sofwave.uk to tighten the skin. This is still early days for her, but we can see she is already well on her way to a great result.
When it comes to the neck, combination treatments are usually the answer to the best results.
What do you think?